Message-ID: <4877990.1075858681103.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 07:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: c..williams@enron.com
Subject: SCE Stipulation
Cc: b..sanders@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, 
	jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: b..sanders@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, 
	jeff.dasovich@enron.com
X-From: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JSTEFFE>
X-To: Williams, Robert C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rwillia2>
X-cc: Sanders, Richard B. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rsander>, Tribolet, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtribole>, Mellencamp, Lisa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lmellen>, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jdasovic>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged)\Sanders, Richard B.\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged).pst

Bob --

Where do we stand on the SCE stipulation?  I want to make sure that our push in SCE doesn't conflict or contradict something we are doing in the PG&E discussions.

Can we meet today?

Jim